AskGamblers has a blunt way of summarising an operator’s reputation, and the page for fortune clock makes for uncomfortable reading. The casino, live since 2020 under a Curacao Gaming Control Board licence, carries a terminated status, a very low expert score and a player score that barely moves the needle. That label doesn’t appear by chance; it accumulates from how an operator actually behaves toward the people funding it. When a review site pulls the plug, the smart move is to read why.
The Scorecard, Unfiltered
The numbers attached to this operator are not the kind that inspire confidence. AskGamblers marks the casino as terminated, and the complaint log tells a consistent story of withdrawal rejections, delays, verification headaches and account closures. Thirty of 36 complaints show as resolved, but the sums involved are real money for the players who filed them.
| Metric | What the Listing Shows |
|---|---|
| Status | Terminated |
| Expert score | Very low |
| Player score | Weak |
| Complaints resolved | 30 out of 36 |
| Average complaint amount | Around $3,047 |
| Average response time | About 2 days |
| Average resolution duration | About 8 days |
What Still Works on Paper
It’s not all bad. The casino pulls from a broad provider pool – Microgaming, NetEnt, Play’n GO, Red Tiger, Nolimit City, Push Gaming, Evolution Gaming for live dealer action and more – so the game lobby has genuine depth. Mobile players can jump in through a browser without installing an app, and the games themselves are described as fair and random. Live chat is supposedly available around the clock, with email as a backup.
- Broad set of recognisable game providers
- 24/7 live chat support
- Mobile browser play with no app required
- Games described as fair and randomly generated
Where the Fine Print Stings
Flip the panel over, and every positive has a catch. Withdrawals sit in a 36-hour pending state before they even start moving, and the details panel marks most responsible-gambling tools as unavailable. No video poker, no progressive jackpots, no listed RTP, no game history. The restricted-country list cuts deep: United States, Ukraine, Canada, Spain, France, Netherlands and Italy are all off limits.
- 36-hour withdrawal pending time before processing even begins
- Responsible-gambling tools largely marked unavailable
- No video poker, progressives, RTP disclosure or game history
- Restricted countries include the US, Canada, Spain, France, the Netherlands, Italy and Ukraine
- Complaint themes repeat: rejected withdrawals, delays, account closures, verification friction
Money In, Money Out
Deposits accept Visa, Mastercard, Payz, Payeer, Perfect Money, WebMoney and even carrier billing via Megafone, Beeline and Tele2. Withdrawals run through a similar list, minus WebMoney but with QIWI added. No fees are listed, and the published limits look workable on the surface: 2,000 per day, 10,000 per week, 40,000 per month in EUR or USD. The catch is the 36-hour pending window and the complaint record that suggests smooth cashouts are the exception rather than the rule. Support sits at live chat and email, with no FAQ page to lean on when something goes sideways at 2 a.m.
The Practical Takeaway
If you still want to play here, treat it as a high-risk experiment, not a home. Deposit only what you can afford to lose, expect a longer than advertised wait when you cash out, and screenshot every document you send for verification. But here’s the honest version: a terminated listing on AskGamblers, mixed player reviews and a complaint pattern that keeps repeating is not a small detail. It’s the whole story. There are plenty of Curacao-licensed casinos without a ‘terminated’ stamp next to their name. Time is the one thing you don’t need to gamble.